Services

DevOps Engineering

DevOps engineering automates the path between writing code and running it safely. It includes CI/CD pipelines, configuration management, and infrastructure changes that do not rely on manual steps.

Releases should be routine rather than risky. Boring pipelines, GitOps workflows where Git is the source of truth, and automation replace manual runbooks instead of just documenting them.

Problems this usually starts from

These issues usually prompt a conversation:

  • Releases depend on one person remembering manual steps.
  • A CI pipeline exists, but nobody trusts it enough to deploy on a Friday.
  • CI takes so long that people deploy less often.
  • Environments have drifted from the documentation.
  • Every new service re-solves the deployment problem from scratch.
  • Manual rollbacks cause stress instead of offering a known-good, tested path.
  • Infrastructure changes happen by hand and get forgotten.

What an engagement looks like

A short call starts the engagement. I determine what exists, where it breaks down, and what “done” looks like, instead of assuming the documented tooling matches reality. I agree on scope upfront: either a fixed piece of work (“get this pipeline to a state where nobody fears it”) or an ongoing placement alongside the existing team.

Changes go through the existing review process. Deliverables are concrete — pipelines, GitOps configuration, and runbooks that live in Git, not slide decks. The automation outlives the engagement and is documented well enough for the next person on call to understand and change it without me.

Typical work includes GitLab CI pipelines that fail fast and explain why, GitOps rollout patterns with FluxCD so “what is actually running” is answerable from Git, and Ansible playbooks that replace tribal knowledge with reviewable, repeatable code. When a pipeline already half-works, I prioritise fixing the parts that block releases over rewriting it from the ground up.

You can buy work a piece at a time, or as a block of days each month. Both are fractional DevOps. The engagement and pricing page explains how I scope, agree on, and price it. The fractional DevOps cost in the UK page compares costs against hiring.

Questions

Remote or on-site?

Either — depends on the engagement. Comfortable with a regular on-site day where required.

Long contracts only, or shorter work too?

Both. That includes urgent, one-off issues — a deploy pipeline that’s broken and blocking releases, a bad rollout that needs untangling fast — not just fixed-scope projects or longer placements. No running contract required to get started on something like that.

What if GitLab CI or GitHub Actions is already in place?

Fine — the aim is rarely to replace what’s there wholesale, more to fix the parts causing pain and leave the rest alone.

How do you report progress on longer engagements?

Whatever’s already in use — a Slack update, a ticket per piece of work, a short weekly note. No separate reporting process bolted on top of how the team already works.

Do you work with a specific cloud provider?

Most commonly AWS, but the DevOps side of things — GitLab CI, GitOps, Ansible — isn’t tied to one provider and carries over to whatever’s actually in use.

Get in touch

Also